ACTIVITY PROFILE BETWEEN WINNERS AND LOSERS SILAT OLAHRAGA IN WOMEN CLASS B, C AND D SINGAPORE 28 SEA GAMES 2015
ACTIVITY
PROFILE BETWEEN WINNERS AND LOSERS SILAT OLAHRAGA IN WOMEN CLASS B, C AND D SINGAPORE 28 SEA GAMES
2015
ABSTRACT
A notational analysis of Silat Tanding at all
five matches for Women and Men Class D in SEA GAMES 2015 was conduct to
identify and determine the activity profile of kicking. The five matches as
mentioned above were Women Class D Final(Viet Vs Mas), quarter finals (Thai Vs
Sin), semi finals (Mas Vs Sin), semi finals (Sin Vs Laos) and quarter finals
(Sin Vs Ind). It was then categorized as Kick Hit Target(KHT), Kick Hit
Elsewhere(KHE) and Kick Missing Opponent(KMO). All of movement classifications
will be utilized including punch, kick, sweep, topple, block, self-discharge
and so on, to decide the exactness and recurrence of what number of fruitful
procedure is great. The purpose of the analysis is to determine the significant
difference between winners and losers on the action during the match time. The
notational analysis was made by analyzing the video downloaded from YouTube. Statistical
analysis used in this study is SPSS version 20.0. The comparison between red
and blue will analyse using the independent T-Test. The notational analysis was
used to record all the selected outcomes to compliment this study such as hit
target, hit elsewhere and miss opponent indicators. The study failed to reject the null
hypothesis. Notational analysis proved to be a valuable tool for better
training through technical and tactical aspects of artistic interpretation in relation to the
level of competition.
INTRODUCTION
It is believed that Silat was
initially defined and formalized during the Srivijayan Empire (seventh Century CE),
situated in Sumatra Island. From the seventh century onwards, the battle
specialty of Silat had effectively spread all through the Malay Peninsula.
Hundreds of years of tribal fighting and common wars prompted migration of
individuals from Sumatra, Java and Sulawesi (in present-day Indonesia) to the
Malay Peninsula and all through Southeast Asia. Pencak silat is a combination
of art and martial. Pencak silat cover the martial art games that combine art
and performed in the beautiful dance style. The dance steps in the Pencak silat
have a relationship with self-defense attack. It is support by music, which aim
to create a festive environment in the martial arts event. Silat olahraga form
based on the development of institution seni pencak silat and martial arts. Hence, silat olahraga is fairly developed and
expended on par with other martial arts. This is important because over the
years many athletes have never participated in silat olahraga game.
Silat
olahraga competitions use the elements of the game that based on norms of the
sport. In silat olahraga competition, there are three types of games such as
championship games, games shows and free competition or extraordinary
championship (Wahab, 1996).
The main role of silat is constantly self-protection. No cognizant exertion is
made to make universal silat an arrangement of physical instruction or a game.
silat's specialized essentials manage the utilization of weapons; no soldier is
ever required to enter battle depending just on his void hands.
The word martial means the type of sport or
game, which consists of rapid movements in attack and defense Silat sport is a
sport that is in the midst of the development of thousands of martial arts
schools in the archipelago. Sport means the ability to silat exponent to
perform martial arts techniques in combat with the striking and defensive
actions such as hitting, kicking, throwing, catching, parrying and blocking and
expertise related to martial arts techniques. In physical strength and
flexibility increase in adult or elite martial arts athletes (Callister,
Staron, Fleck, Tesch, Dudley,1991) .
MATERIALS
AND METHOD
The notational
analysis was made by analyzing the video downloaded from channel Sport
Singapore by YouTube. By watching these videos, the
matches had been used to notated and analyzed in this study. The five matches that we’ve been analysed were
Women Class D Final(Viet Vs Mas), quarter finals (Thai Vs Sin), semi finals
(Mas Vs Sin), semi finals (Sin Vs Laos) and quarter finals (Sin Vs Ind). This variable is then
divided into several parts which are Kick Hit Target, Kick Hit Elsewhere and
Kick Missing Opponent. The video consist of Women Class B, C and D. The video
came from quarter-finals, semi-finals and final matches.
At the time of
analyzing, the analyzer use video media player to play the video. Every match consists of three (3) rounds in
total of fighting. Two (2) minutes for every round, with 1 minute rest between
each round.
The video then were played in slow-motion to identify the action/skills made by
the exponents. Sometimes, if necessary, the video will be repeated to get the
accurate analyze (Shapie, Nizam, Oliver, O'donoghue, & Tong, 2013).
MOTION
ANALYSIS
In silat, there are different types of
motion such as:
Punch:
The punch ‘tumbuk’ attack is done by a
hand with closed fist hitting the target. In silat, punching is often used to
fight the opponent. It can be a straight punch ‘tumbuk lurus’ or uppercut
‘sauk’ to exponent body’s (Anuar, 1992).
Kick:
The kick ‘tendang’ or ‘terajang’ is an
ataacking movement which is performed with one leg or two legs simultaneously.
A kick can be aimed at any target. It can be front kick ‘tendang depan’, side
kick ‘depak’ or semi-circular side kick ‘ tendang lengkar’(Anuar, 1992).
Block:
The blocking movements begin with the
posture position ‘sikap pasang’: the exponent stands straight with his hands
around his body or close to his chest. Blocking or parrying ‘tangkisan’ can be
done using arms, elbows and legs with the purpose to block off or striking back
at any attck (Anuar, 1992).
Catch:
The catch ‘tangkapan’ is done by using the
hand to obstruct the opponent from carrying out an attack. The silat exponent
is able to prevent himself from being attacked by pointing the attack which he
has caught to another direction. A catch which twists or drags the opponent is
forbidden. Also, a catch which could break the part which is being held such as
the leg and waist is also forbidden. These regulations exit to protect the
silat exponent’s (Anuar, 1992).
Topple:
There are various ways of toppling down
one’s opponent. For example, a silat exponent ‘pesilat’ can either push, shove
the opponent’s back leg from the bad or from the side, shove, hit, kick, strike
or punch to make the opponent lose his balance. Every falls is considered valid
as long as the sila exponent topples his opponent down without wresting or he
is able to overpower the opponent whom he has brought down (Anuar, 1992).
Sweep:
Swiping ‘sapuan’ involves attacking an
opponent’s leg which is on the ground to unstable him and brings down to the
ground. A silat exponent can perform this attacking movement either with his
right or left leg. Hence, front sweep ‘sapuan depan’ is done by swinging the
leg to the front to push an opponent’s leg, while back sweep ‘sapuan belakang’
is carried out by swinging the leg backward to hit the back leg (Anuar, 1992).
Evade/Dodge:
The evade ‘elakan’ technique is carried
out by silat exponent when he tries to evade an attack. This technique does not
require the silat exponent to touch the opponent in fending off the attack.
They are many ways of carrying out his defensive movement such as dodging
‘gelek’, retreat ‘mundur’, evasion to the side ‘elak sisi’, bending ‘elak
serung’, jumping ‘lonjak’ ducking ‘susup’ and etc. (Anuar, 1992).
Self-Release:
Self-release ‘lepas tangkapan’ technique
is a technique to unlock any clinch or catch from an opponent (Anuar, 1993).
Block
and Punch:
The blocking technique is used to block
any hand or leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using
the leg to kick the opponent (Shapie, Oliver, O’Donoghue, & Tong, 2013).
Block
and Kick:
The blocking technique is used to block
any hand or leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using
sweeping technique to the opponent (Shapie et al., 2013). Block and Sweep:
The blocking technique is used to block
any hand or leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using
sweeping technique to the opponent (Shapie et al., 2013).
Fake
Punch:
An action which a silat exponent intends
to confuse the opponent using a fake punch to break his opponent’s defensive
posture (Shapie et al., 2013).
Fake
Kick:
An action which a silat exponent intends
to confuse the opponent using a fake kick to break his opponent defensive
posture (Shapie et al., 2013).
RELIABILITY
OF OBSERVATION
The author analyzed all the activities and
simultaneously classified each change of motion in a 5 separated match. Observations
were done separated by 48 hours. It requires experienced silat olahraga
practitioners to analyses the data as the movement of both exponents is fast,
needing close inspection. The classification of movement was subjective with
work being classified according to the instruction given by the referee.
STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS
Statistical
analysis used in this study is SPSS version 21. The process to analyze the data
involved Microsoft Words, Microsoft
Excel and SPSS. The remark
generated data will be regularity counted, and every round of data will be
composed to be analysed. All the raw data collected from the all matches use
the (SPSS) Statistical package social science system that produced by Shapie at
al 2013. A descriptive analysis was used to determine the difference
performance between the winners and losers in silat matches and all the data
had been notate the mean, standard deviation and standard error.
RESULT
Final Women’s Class D 65 KG Vietnam versus Malaysia (Vietnam
lose) (Malaysia Win)
Thi Yen Nguyen Vs Siti Rahmah Mohamed Nasir
Table 1 Frequency of actions and outcomes during recorded
during Silat Olahraga match
Action
|
Outcome
|
|||||||
Hit
elsewhere
|
Hit Target
|
Miss
Opponent
|
Total
|
|||||
Country
|
MAS
|
VIE
|
MAS
|
VIE
|
MAS
|
VIE
|
MAS
|
VIE
|
Block
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
5
|
7
|
7
|
Block and kick
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
||
Block and Punch
|
||||||||
Block and Sweep
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
|||
Kick
|
10
|
13
|
15
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
31
|
32
|
Fake Kick
|
2
|
2
|
||||||
Punch
|
4
|
5
|
12
|
7
|
3
|
16
|
15
|
|
Fake Punch
|
||||||||
Self-Release
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
6
|
7
|
|
Topple
|
1
|
4
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
|||
Sweep
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
||||
Catch
|
5
|
1
|
6
|
10
|
11
|
11
|
||
Dodge
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
|||||
Other
|
||||||||
Total
|
18
|
24
|
54
|
23
|
20
|
39
|
92
|
86
|
Pencak Silat Women’s Tanding class D 65kg category
quarterfinals
Singapore vs Thailand (Singapore Win) (Thailand Lose)
Table 2 Frequency of
actions and outcomes during recorded during Silat Olahraga match
Action
|
SINGAPORE
|
THAILAND
|
|||||
Hit
elsewhere
|
Hit
Target
|
Miss
Opponent
|
Hit
elsewhere
|
Hit
Target
|
Miss
Opponent
|
Total
|
|
Block and Kick
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
11
|
Block and Punch
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
10
|
Block and Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
Kick
|
4
|
14
|
3
|
12
|
11
|
11
|
55
|
Fake kick
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Punch
|
1
|
19
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
28
|
Fake punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Self-release
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Topple
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
7
|
Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
Catch
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
6
|
Dodge
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Total
|
7
|
43
|
15
|
23
|
20
|
19
|
127
|
Pencak Silat Women’s Tanding class D 65kg category
Semi Finals
Singapore vs Malaysia (Singapore Lose) (Malaysia Win)
Table 3 Frequency of actions and outcomes during
recorded during Silat Olahraga match
Action
|
Outcome
|
|||||||
Hit
elsewhere
|
Hit
Target
|
Miss
Opponent
|
Total
|
|||||
Country
|
MAS
|
SIN
|
MAS
|
SIN
|
MAS
|
SIN
|
MAS
|
SIN
|
Block
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Block and kick
|
1
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
Block and Punch
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
Block and Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Kick
|
14
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
16
|
4
|
Fake Kick
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
Punch
|
11
|
6
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
6
|
Fake Punch
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
Self-Release
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Topple
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
Sweep
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Catch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Dodge
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Other
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
33
|
14
|
5
|
5
|
12
|
7
|
51
|
32
|
Silat Olahraga Women’s Tanding
class C 60kg category quarterfinals
Singapore vs Indonesia (Indonesia
Win) (Singapore Lose)
Table 4 Frequency of actions and outcomes during
recorded during Silat Olahraga match
Action
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
|||
Winner
|
Loser
|
Winner
|
Loser
|
Winner
|
Loser
|
||
Block & Punch
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
8
|
||
Block & Kick
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
12
|
||
Block & Sweep
|
|||||||
Block
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
|||
Kick
|
11
|
9
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
30
|
Fake Kick
|
|||||||
Punch
|
1
|
5
|
6
|
||||
Fake Punch
|
|||||||
Topple
|
2
|
2
|
|||||
Catch
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
|||
Dodge
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
||||
Sweep
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
||||
Self-Release
|
1
|
||||||
Total
|
20
|
18
|
12
|
10
|
10
|
7
|
76
|
153
|
|||||||
Silat Olahraga Women’s Tanding Class B category
Semi Finals
Laos vs Singapore (Laos Win) (Singapore Lose)
Table 5 Frequency
of actions and outcomes during recorded during Silat Olahraga match
Action
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Opponent
|
Total
|
|||
WINNER
|
LOSER
|
WINNER
|
LOSER
|
WINNER
|
LOSER
|
||
Block & Punch
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
4
|
Block & Kick
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
Block & Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
Block
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Kick
|
14
|
20
|
18
|
9
|
16
|
5
|
82
|
Fake Kick
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
Punch
|
7
|
16
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
25
|
Fake Punch
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Topple
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
Catch
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
9
|
Dodge
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Sweep
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
14
|
Self-Release
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
Total
|
32
|
40
|
27
|
17
|
31
|
17
|
164
|
328
|
|||||||
Frequency profiles
Final Women’s Class D 65 KG Vietnam versus Malaysia (Vietnam
Lose) (Malaysia Win)
Exponent
|
Punch
|
Kick
|
Topple
|
Sweep
|
Total
|
WINNER
|
16
|
31
|
5
|
2
|
54
|
LOSER
|
15
|
32
|
6
|
1
|
54
|
Total
|
31
|
63
|
11
|
3
|
108
|
Quarter Finals Women’s Class D 65KG Singapore Vs Thailand
(Singapore Win) (Thailand Lose)
EXPONENT
|
SWEEP
|
KICK
|
PUNCH
|
TOPPLE
|
TOTAL
|
WINNER
|
3
|
21
|
20
|
4
|
48
|
LOSER
|
2
|
34
|
8
|
3
|
47
|
TOTAL
|
5
|
55
|
28
|
7
|
95
|
Semi Finals Women ‘s Class D 65KG Singapore vs Malaysia (Singapore Lose) (Malaysia Win)
SWEEP
|
|||||
MALAYSIA
|
0
|
16
|
13
|
6
|
35
|
SINGAPORE
|
1
|
4
|
6
|
3
|
14
|
TOTAL
|
1
|
20
|
19
|
9
|
49
|
Quarter Finals Women ‘s Class C 60KG Singapore Vs
Indonesia (Singapore Lose)
(Indonesia Win)
Exponent
|
Kick
|
Punch
|
Sweep
|
Topple
|
Total
|
Winner
|
15
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
22
|
Loser
|
15
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
20
|
Semi Finals Women ‘s Class B Laos Vs Singapore (Singapore Lose) (Laos Win)
SWEEP
|
|||||
WINNER
|
6
|
48
|
8
|
3
|
65
|
LOSER
|
8
|
34
|
17
|
4
|
63
|
TOTAL
|
14
|
82
|
25
|
7
|
128
|
DISCUSSION
As the result
obtained, mean value for Kick Hit Target(KHT) for the winner is bigger than the
loser while for Kick Hit Elesewhere(KHE) and Kick Missing Opponent(KMO) are
smaller for the winner compare to the loser. This data are accepteable as the
winner hit target for most of the times during the matches. KHE and KMO are not
important for the exponents to get the point for winning the game. Independent paired t-test is used to collect
the data from 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015, Final Women’s Class D
65 KG Vietnam versus Malaysia, quarter finals (Thai Vs Sin), semi finals (Mas
Vs Sin), semi finals (Sin Vs Laos) and quarter finals (Sin Vs Ind). Malaysia
won the game (vs Vietnam) made an exact motion in collecting point as Malaysian
athlete SITI RAHMAH MOHAMED NASIR by blocking and attacking at the same time.
The mean values for overall motion of action and outcomes for.
Vietnam has the
mean of 1.86 and Malaysia is 1.88 a little bit higher than Malaysia. All the
result shown that, higher means lost the game. In
summary, Vietnam athletes have been chosen to see the factor of losing and
winning in analysing their motion category that they used. Vietnam using frequent attacking such punching and
kicking but most of the attack hit elsewhere and not the target, the mean and
standard deviation Malaysia is slightly better than Vietnam. Mean and standard
deviation for Malaysia were M(1.88) and SD(.732) over Vietnam were M(1.86) and
SD(.672). The mistake that Vietnam did is less self-release. They focus so much
on punching and kicking that the Malaysia have been waiting to catch and
straight down to swept the Vietnam athlete. Vietnam
frequently using kicking on hit target but weak in defencing and lack of
self-release skill that they easily got toppled by Malaysia athlete.
Based on the data collected and result, the match between
Singapore vs Indonesia was winning by Wewey Wita from Indonesia. What can I
observed from the video was Indonesia did more attacking than Singapore. As we
can see from the result, Indonesia makes 11 kick hit target, 1 punch hit target
and 5 block and kick hit target. As we can saw the sampled paired test at the
table above show, there were totally different in hit target between Indonesia
and Singapore. This observation can saw that Indonesia attack more than
Singapore. Singapore gives more opportunity to Indonesia to make more attacking
during match.
From the match result Singapore vs Laos class B 55kg
category which Laos is winning this match, Laos is more used kicking skill than
Singapore. That is why Laos get more point. Furthermore, Laos do less mistake
that can deduct her point than Singapore. Besides kicking, Laos also do more
block and kicking hit target to her opponent. Singapore also do more skill such
as kicking and punching hit target but at the same time, Singapore do lot of
mistake that deduct her point and finally got less point because of her
mistakes.
For the match result which is quarter finals Singapore vs
Thailand class D 65kg category which Singapore is winning this match Nurul
Suhaila Mohamed Saiful, what can I observed from the video is Singapore do more
attacking than Thailand. As we can see from the result, Singapore makes 19
times punch hit target, 14 times kick hit target and 2 times topple toward her
opponent. As we can see the sample paired test at the table above show, there
are totally different between winning and losing. This observation for the
winner while for the loser is Thailand make less attacking during match.
Thailand gives more opportunity to Singapore to make more attacking during
match.
The match of semi
finals Singapore vs Malaysia class D 65kg category which Singapore lose this
match, what can I observed from the video is Malaysia do more attacking than
Singapore. As we can see from the result, Singapore makes only 6 times punch
hit target, 4 times kick hit target and 3 times topple toward her opponent. As
we can see the sample paired test at the table above show, there are totally
different between winning and losing. This observation for the loser while for
the winner is Malaysia make more attacking during match. Singapore gives more
opportunity to Malaysia to make more attacking during match.
Referring to Aziz,
Tan, and Teh (2002) others martial arts may have same movement with “silat
olahraga” but there must have any different related to the exponent relative.
For example, in Tae Kwando can be devide into 3 section which is sparring,
patterns and destruction. In sparring it is involves of development their
timing, focus and speed. It is important in controlled environment to prevent
the injuries occurs. Study conducted by Aziz et al.,(2002) Silat tend to have
more explosive power on lower limb compared to Tae Kwando and the athletes able
to controlled their lower body function to prevent from injuries.
CONCLUSION
Seni pencak silat
is a combination of martial and art. This study want to determine the
significant difference between winners and losers by focusing on Kick Hit
Target, Kick Hit Elsewhere and Kick Missing Opponent. According to Shapie,
Oliver, O’Donoghue, Tong (2013) it is important to understand that high
intensity actions such as punch, kick, topple, sweep and block will contribute
more in the score points rather than low intensity actions in Pencak Silat. Notational analysis proved to be a valuable
tool for better training through technical and tactical aspects of artistic interpretation in relation to the
level of competition. By notating the matches, it clearly
seen that most of the exponents will use kick during the game. They did the
movement with very high speed to ensure they got the point.
RECOMMENDATION
It
is recommended that the sample size should be more than 30 in order to develop
new hypothesis. This means that the category of Silat Tanding should be more
various and increase the participation in SEA Games. Otherwise, we will need
more study in this field for future improvement in Seni Pencak Silat. The variables
(skills) should be more specific in details so that the variation of creed can
be minimized. This will help a better research development onwards. The
reliability of data can be improved by the specification of the skills. Coaches need to emphasize the skill
related fitness of and athlete to enhance their performance. There is a
limitation of this case study as the findings here only represent only four
silat match, so the findings cannot be generalised to all silat competition
APPENDICES
Final Women’s Class D 65 KG Vietnam versus
Malaysia (Vietnam lose) (Malaysia Win)
Statistics
|
||
MAS
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
23
|
Missing
|
0
|
|
Mean
|
1.86
|
|
Std. Error
of Mean
|
.101
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.732
|
|
Statistics
|
||
VIE
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
0
|
Missing
|
4
|
|
Mean
|
1.86
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.090
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.672
|
|
Silat Olahraga Women’s Tanding class D 65kg category
quarterfinals
Singapore vs Thailand (Singapore Win) ( Thailand
lose)
Statistics
|
||
THAILAND
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
46
|
Missing
|
2
|
|
Mean
|
1.46
|
|
Std. Error of Mean
|
.127
|
|
Std. Deviation
|
.862
|
|
Statistics
|
||
SINGAPORE
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
48
|
Missing
|
0
|
|
Mean
|
1.79
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.130
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.898
|
|
Pencak Silat
Women’s Tanding class D 65kg category semifinals
Singapore vs
Malaysia (Singapore Lose) (Malaysia Win)
Siti Suhaila
Mohammed Saiful (SIN) vs Siti Rahmah
Mohamed Nasir (MAS)
Statistics
|
||
MALAYSIA
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
37
|
Missing
|
0
|
|
Mean
|
1.9189
|
|
Std. Error
of Mean
|
.17058
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
1.03758
|
|
Statistics
|
||
SINGAPORE
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
14
|
Missing
|
23
|
|
Mean
|
2.21
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.300
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
1.122
|
|
Pencak Silat
Women’s Tanding class C 60kg category Quarter Finals
Singapore
vs Indonesia, Nurul Shafiqah vs Wewey Wita. (
Statistics
|
||
Loser
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
20
|
Missing
|
2
|
|
Mean
|
1.25
|
|
Std. Error of Mean
|
.099
|
|
Std. Deviation
|
.444
| |
Statistics
|
||
Winner
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
21
|
Missing
|
1
|
|
Mean
|
1.71
|
|
Std. Error of Mean
|
.240
|
|
Std. Deviation
|
1.102
|
|
Silat
Olahraga Women’s Tanding Class B category Semi Finals
Laos vs
Singapore (Laos Win) (Singapore Lose)
Statistics
|
||
LOSER
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
63
|
Missing
|
2
|
|
Mean
|
2.2698
|
|
Std. Error of Mean
|
.09655
|
|
Std. Deviation
|
.76636
|
|
Statistics
|
||
WINNER
|
||
N
|
Valid
|
65
|
Missing
|
0
|
|
Mean
|
2.1231
|
|
Std.
Error of Mean
|
.07755
|
|
Std.
Deviation
|
.62519
|
|
REFERENCES
Anuar
AW. Teknik dalam seni silat melayu [In Malay] (Technique in Silat Melayu).
Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka; 1992.
Anuar, A. W. (1993). Silat Olahraga (2nd
edn.). The art, technique and regulations.
Aziz, A. R., Tan, B., & Teh, K. C.
(2002). Physiological responses during matches and profile of elite pencak
silat exponents. Journal of Sports
Science and Medicine, 1, 147-155.
Callister, R., Callister, R., Staron, R.,
Fleck, S., Tesch, P., & Dudley, G. (1991). Physiological Characteristics of
Elite Judo Athletes. International Journal of Sports Medicine Int J Sports Med,
12(02), 196-203. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1024667
Pencak Silat
Tanding Women's Class D Final VIE vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th SEA Games Singapore
2015. (n.d.). Retrieved June 08, 2016, from https://youtu.be/8znlq-xjOzc
Wahab, A. A.
(1996). Silat Olahraga (4th ed.).
Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Comments
Post a Comment